Yuga posted that the prices of quad cores have gone down by half. The question im asking myself now is that: is it worth going to quad core right here and now? Don’t get me wrong, slashing prices almost always is in the best interest of the consumers but if you’re someone who has been thinking of buying a new rig, is it worth jumping on the quad core bandwagon ?
Observations: Quad core ain’t doing squat for most new PC games (which aren’t multi CPU aware, yet) . Hell, my Core 2 duos aren’t being used efficiently in my MMO’s either. Multiple cores are boon for multitaskers though. I usually have my browser with multiple tabs with adobe flash running, image editor, media player on while playing my fave games on without a performance hit. Just make sure you’ve got enough RAM to feed your procs.
Ok, so should you upgrade?
If you’ve got a old pentium 3 pc, upgrade NOW. As in run to your friendly neighborhood PC shop and get one of these babies and slap it onto a new rig setup. Thank me later…
If you’ve got an old Pentium 4 (2 years or more), then it depends on what you wanna do with your PC. If your old PC is sluggish, make sure you have 1GB of ram installed. It may also be a good time to reformat that drive. I have a first gen 2.4Ghz p4 and an athlon xp 2500 still running smoothly on Windows XP, even while gaming.
Pentium 4 3.0’s and later - Probably wanna upgrade if you want to push those framerates on those games (although pair your proc with a good Videocard). or for faster video encoding for apps that use multi cores.
Dual Cores - Either you need the extra cores for server processing duties or you have lots of cash to blow. or you want faster video encoding (assuming your application supports 4 cores).
Remember: Get at least 1GB of ram of the fastest memory clockspeed your mobo supports. If you can afford it, get 2GB or more. Especially if you’re gonna use Windows Vista.
4 Responses to “Do i need Quad Cores ?”
The cheapest upgrade is always adding more RAM. Doubling your memory does wonders for performance.
I’m currently reviewing a 512MB RAM laptop running on Vista. Definitely a terribly slow experience, especially since I’m used to my 2GB desktop replacement.
Great post Kiven!
i reviwed a 17inch core 2 duo laptop with 1gb ram with dual 7950 vc’s a couple of months ago and vista ultimate killed it. nuff said.
Vista Ultimate needs 2Gb to be comfortable. My desktop runs a second Vista Ultimate OS and the 2GB just barely made it.
yeah, exactly. Vista’s 2gb is like 1gb to Windows XP. next thing we know, we’re talking about 8gb minimum RAM for the OS alone. sheesh.
Leave a Reply